Well after all the excitement of my blog
from 3rd May (Learning Me Your (Hebrew) Language) I finally got to see The Merchant of Venice on Monday night as part
of The Globe’s international Globe to Globe season. Every review (and this one) I have read since has focused largely on the demonstrations and disruptions that some
members of the audience created. Oh,
yeah, did I not mention that the evening turned out to be a hotbed of political
activism before my very eyes? The nature
of the specifics of the protests can be found here, but in spite of all the
police, security guards and airport style detectors, over the course of the
evening several realisations became very clear to me.
1.
You can never see the same
play too many times.
This particular production depicted Shylock
in the most humane way I have ever seen, ultimately giving me a completely
different feeling about the rest of the characters, and therefore questioning
the validity of their happy endings. This was an unexpected pleasure.
2.
Peaceful protests can be
really rather lovely.
People on opposing sides of the debate, held
placards in separated areas on Bankside in the afternoon sun, smilingly handing
out leaflets and playing music, demonstrating the importance of standing up for
beliefs and sharing opinions with respect.
It was powerful.
3.
Protests lose their impact
when art is disrupted.
Once inside the theatre, the outbursts and
banner-unfurling became sinister. Censorship is always worrying, and the
organised disruptions at regular intervals of the performance only seemed to
alienate the protesters and their valid cause from the rest of the
audience. It suddenly felt very
important that the play continue as was summed up to loud cheers by one
audience member, as he shouted “Carry on, we’re all with you!”
My view |
The play did carry on, and the professionalism of the actors was rewarded by an extended curtain call, with many of the audience getting to their feet. I felt they deserved it for their interpretation of a complex play not just for the challenges that particular performance had faced.
And as for the initial concerns that I had
aired in my previous blog - those relating to understanding an evening of
Hebrew Shakespeare? Well, they were
completely unfounded. Even if I hadn’t
been able to see the English summarised subtitles at the end of each scene, I
knew exactly what was going on. This was
mostly, I suspect, due to knowing the plot well, but also the visually rich
interpretation that included dancing caskets, well-timed slapstick, and the
most wonderfully symbolic costume for Portia that recognised the binding
legalities to which she was subject, but then cunningly changed into the chains
that held the arrested Antonio, and ultimately Shylock, in the dramatic court scene.
A final highlight for me was that The
Globe’s Artistic Director, Dominic Dromgoole poked his head into the middle
gallery at the interval to check we were all OK (several of the protesters had
been seated in the row in front of us.)
I did wonder for a second whether it would be a good opportunity to
pitch my novel/script/personality at him; this could have been the only
time I got the chance. In the
event, he seemed a little flustered what with all the threats and metal detectors and stuff, so I let him get on.
Shame.
He seemed like a nice man.